A few quotes from the bulletin:
detection of the crack may only be possible from the rear of the blade
I always looked at the front - good advise - article has an good explanation as to why. Another quote:
Investigation has shown that cracks have propagated over a long period, which in some cases exceeds thirty ground/air/ground cycles i.e. thirty flights. There is no evidence to suggest that failures have occurred where a crack may have propagated from initiation to final failure in one ground/air/ground cycle i.e. one flight. Therefore detection of the crack and prevention of failures of this nature should be achievable.
A quick inspection before flight can prevent blade failures.
Some blade paint schemes are not conducive to easy inspection of
the rear surface of the blade...
Piston engines and engine mounts were painted with a thin coat of brittle enamel paint. Through long experience we found that cracks would appear through the paint. The paint did not prevent inspection. Now the customer wants a thick powder-coat gloss finish. Cracks and corrosion are hidden; inspection is hindered or made impossible. Aerospace is more concerned with performance, endurance, inspectability than cosmetics and bright colors under the hood.
No comments:
Post a Comment